Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Moviegoer Diary: American Gangster, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly


AMERICAN GANGSTER

Plot in a Nutshell:
Denzel Washington is a ’70s Harlem drug kingpin and Russell Crowe is the New Jersey cop determined to bring him down.

Thoughts:
I spent the last couple of days catching up with the last few Oscar nominees I still hadn’t seen. (I don’t think I’ll ever get around to watching Elizabeth: The Golden Age or La Vie en Rose, though. I feel more guilty about that second omission than the first one, especially since Marion Cotillard looked like such a movie star when she accepted her Best Actress Oscar, but since Oscar-baiting musical biopics have replaced post-apocalyptic action movies and fantasy epics based on multi-volume children’s novels as my new least-favourite film genre, I think I’ll just wait to catch her next year opposite Johnny Depp in Michael Mann’s Public Enemies.)

Anyway: American Gangster! Wow... Ruby Dee is barely in this thing! I’m guessing she has less than five minutes of screen time—her performance might even be briefer than Judi Dench’s Oscar-winning turn in Shakespeare in Love. (Has anyone gotten out a stopwatch and actually calculated which performance is longer? I’d be curious to find out.)

Even though the bit where Dee slaps Denzel Washington after learning the extent to which he’s in trouble with the law is a fun, melodramatic acting moment—it really looks like she slaps him, too! I mean, she really gets in a good wallop!—Dee’s performance as a whole left me a little cold, her “naturalistic” line delivery coming across as overly calculated and her body language distractingly busy.

But at least Dee makes more of an impression than most of the supporting performers in this curiously flat crime epic, which works neither as a cop-vs.-crook battle-of-the-titans star vehicle for Crowe and Washington, nor as a GoodFellas-style evocation of a colourful, bygone criminal milieu. Too much time is devoted to tangents like Crowe’s custody battle for his son, and Washington’s performance seems like a miscalculation—I assume he and director Ridley Scott were hoping to show the paradox of a ruthless, amoral drug dealer who could also be extremely charming in his personal dealings, but they end up only sentimentalizing him. By the time I got to the film’s final image—a would-be “iconic” freeze-frame of Crowe and Washington, now middle-aged best buddies, cradling their takeout coffee as they cross a busy New York street—I no longer had any idea what Scott was trying to say with this film. Cops and criminals aren’t so different after all? Middle age erases all grudges? Everyone becomes legit if they stick around long enough? Thank God for the person who invented the cardboard coffee-cup sleeve?

RATING: 2/5




THE DIVING BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY

Plot in a Nutshell:
Julian Schnabel’s visually inventive adaptation of Jean-Dominique Bauby’s memoir about life as a nearly completely paralyzed victim of “locked-in syndrome.”

Thoughts:
This is a really silly point to start off with, but why do reviewers always say that Jean-Dominique Bauby “blinked out” his memoir The Diving Bell and the Butterfly? Since he could move only one of his eyelids, wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that he winked it out? Or does that just make him sound too coy and flirtatious?

I don’t think Bauby would have taken offence at my observation—one of the best moments in Schnabel’s film comes when a pair of workers arrive in Bauby’s hospital room to install a speakerphone next to his bed. When they learn that he’s completely paralyzed, they ask Bauby’s therapist what use he could possible have for a phone, whereupon one of them remarks, “Maybe he’s a heavy breather!” The therapist angrily scolds them for their irreverence, but we hear Bauby chuckling to himself via voiceover, laughing from deep within his cavernous physical prison.

This light Gallic spirit helps distinguish The Diving Bell and the Butterfly from so many other disease-of-the-week movies—it’s less about the misery of Bauby’s condition than it is about Bauby’s ability to recall the sensual pleasures he enjoyed when he had command of his body, and to appreciate the small bits of colour and stimulation that exist even within the restricted world of his hospital: the red and white stripes of a nearby lighthouse; a new fur hat; the illustrations in an old copy of The Count of Monte Cristo; the beauty of his female therapists; the heartbreaking sound of his aging father’s voice over the telephone.

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly seemed to strike a personal chord particularly with movie critics, who perhaps identified with the way so much of Bauby’s day consists of nothing but passive observation, and painstaking writing sessions. It’s easy to feel like little more than a disembodied eyeball when you’re a full-time movie critic, and it’s nice to see a movie that makes living life that way seem so brave and heroic.

RATING: 4/5

4 comments:

JB said...

Haven't seen Gangster but your comment about Best Supporting Actress nominee Ruby Dee's lack of screen time made me wonder. I was just thinking the other day about how Gloria Grahame (quite deservedly, I'd say) won the same Oscar for what seemed to me like a very compact appearance in Crossfire -but her screen time in that film was probably three times longer than Dee's in Gangster. Do we need a new category maybe? Best cameo by a non-specified gender? And how far do we take it? William Burroughs for Drugstore Cowboy? Billy Zane for Zoolander? Crispin Glover for Wild at Heart? Marshall McLuhan for Annie Hall?

Paul Matwychuk said...

...And I haven't seen CROSSFIRE. But really: Ruby Dee's performance really amounts to only two scenes: one where she reacts with astonished delight to the gigantic house Denzel Washington has bought for her; and another—her big "Oscar moment"—where she confronts Washington about dragging his brothers into a life of crime and slaps him across the face.

I wouldn't be averse to a "Best Cameo Performance" or "Best Single-Scene Performance" or "Best Performance Under Five Minutes" Oscar... It might add a bit of novelty to the ceremony, and could function as the acting equivalent to the Short Film categories. My fear would be that it would devolve the way the "Best Guest Star" awards have at the Emmys, which overwhelmingly tend to honour "drop-in" appearances and masterstrokes of stuntcasting by huge movie stars instead of the often much more interesting episodic TV work by lesser-known character actors.

JB said...

Yeah I think the Best Cameo thing would only function in a parallel universe where the Academy was at once more irreverent and judicious. But man, Crossfire! It features among the very best Robert Ryan nutso performances (and I say that with immense respect and admiration -the man could really, chillingly sell nutso). Plus I have a soft spot for any movie that opens with a fist fight -by faceless combatants in almost total darkness, no less!

cassiegsawyer said...

I loved "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly", but the movie I'd rather see is "My Stroke of Insight", which is the amazing bestselling book by Dr Jill Bolte Taylor. It is an incredible story and there's a happy ending. She was a 37 year old Harvard brain scientist who had a stroke in the left half of her brain. The story is about how she fully recovered, what she learned and experienced, and it teaches a lot about how to live a better life. Her TEDTalk at TED dot com is fantastic too. It's been spread online millions of times and you'll see why!