Saturday, July 11, 2009

Illuminating All Opposition

“Fierce Light” is a phrase that documentarian/activist Velcrow Ripper lifts from bell hooks to describe what he sees as a powerful new grassroots movement springing up around the globe, one that uses spirituality and nonviolence to effect social change. It’s a form of spiritual activism modelled on the example of Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi — and indeed, Ripper’s interviewees in Fierce Light: Where Spirit Meets Action include former SNCC chairman and King associate John Lewis, and Leela Kumari, an Indian lawyer whose work is a continuation of Gandhi’s efforts to end discrimination against the lowly Dalit caste.

But that’s just the beginning of Ripper’s itinerary: he takes his camera to anti-government protests in Oaxaca, Mexico, to Vietnam in the company of exiled peace activist and Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh, and to South Africa for a brief interview with Archbishop Desmond Tutu. There are stopovers at the Vietnam War Memorial and the 2001 protests in Quebec City, and probably a few too many slow-motion shots of water cascading over leaves and people carrying candles.

Ripper’s passion is unquestionable, and it’s hard not to admire his belief that true spirituality should be directed outwardly, towards actively making the world a better place, rather than inwardly, towards complacent self-satisfaction. But that doesn’t make Fierce Light any more satisfying (or coherent) as a viewing experience: Ripper takes his camera all over the world, but he gets the same interviews from everyone he meets, vague testimonials to the power of love and the necessity of peace, but few specifics of how these people managed to buck the odds, mobilize like-minded people, and put their beliefs into action. At one point, Ripper’s narration mentions the Baha’i principle that people should not be told what to think, but his film is essentially a long string of unchallenged assertions — Ripper expresses them in a very soothing voice with gentle music behind him, but that doesn’t make Fierce Light any less of an exercise in pamphleteering.

The only situation Fierce Light explores in depth is an extended protest at a vast urban farm in South Central Los Angeles that was established in the wake of the L.A. riots and has since become a valuable food source and gathering place for the neighbourhood’s poor, but which has been sold to a developer who plans to bulldoze it all and put up warehouses. The protests attract much media attention as well as a few celebrities, most notably actress Daryl Hannah, who camps out in a tree along with two other activists for several weeks — “beautiful weeks,” in Ripper’s words. To him, the protests show a community gloriously united against a powerful opponent, a shining example of “fierce light” in action.

But Ripper’s shortcomings as a filmmaker become glaringly apparent when you compare Fierce Light to The Garden, Scott Hamilton Kennedy’s Oscar-nominated documentary about the South Central Farm, which not only does a better job of placing the protests into their context within L.A. history, but also shows the infighting among the various protesters (not all of whom were acting out of altruism) and the simmering tensions between the blacks and the Hispanics affected by the sale of the farm. Kennedy is still on the side of the protesters, but his more nuanced, less willfully idealized depiction of their struggle will be much more enlightening and useful to anyone hoping to fight a similar battle in their own neighbourhood.

5 comments:

velcrow said...

Actually bell hooks got the phrase from me. Comparing Fierce Light to The Garden is like comparing apples and oranges. Two completely different films trying to do two completely different things. Unlike the Garden, Fierce Light is not a straightforward activist essay film. What it tries to do, and succeeds with many people (I might even say most) is to create a spiritual experience in itself - offering an actual taste of soul force, or Fierce Light as I call it. It does this through the power of the people in the film, the stories, and something you didn't mention at all, stunning cinematography and sound design - the power of art.

It is about a paradigm shift, an attempt to bring together the often separated aspects of spirituality and activism. It is also about trying to bring into balance the head and the heart. Activist have a tendency to be locked into a rationalist perspective, which while important, is incomplete. And yes, it is not a typical linear structure - it is a poetic essay, as are all my films. Sorry the film failed to reach your heart, though it has had a powerful impact on thousands of people - life changing is a common response - as the testimonials at http://www.fiercelight.org indicate.

Paul Matwychuk said...

Thanks for your thoughtful comments about the review. It's true: the film achieves a lovely photographic look on what could not have been a very large budget. And I certainly don't mean to dismiss the reaction of anyone who was moved by Fierce Light's message or inspired to become more politically active because of it.

Perhaps I was looking for something the film simply wasn't intending to give me — I would have liked to have seen fewer spiritual testimonials and a little less narration, and a few more practical details about how the film's subjects put their spirituality into action.

Anyway, I wish you all the best with your film and your future activism. You definitely put your words into action, and that part of Fierce Light presents a powerful challenge to anyone who watches it. Thanks for reading.

velcrow said...

Thank you for taking the time to consider the film - and your thoughtful response to my comment. Much appreciated.

I actually think the Garden and Fierce Light are wonderfully complementary films, and always encourage people to see the Garden. Scott, who is a friend and colleague of mine, focusses primarily on the time leading up to the encampment, whereas I focus exclusively on the encampment itself. I really admire the way he honed in on that story three years earlier, and had the foresight to stay with it that long, capturing an extremely complex backstory, and creating a dynamic film.

My films don't work in the way traditional documentaries do, and can be frustrating if you approach them looking for what isn't there. To me it's not more facts, more information, more details that gives a film depth - it's about how deeply it moves the audience, and with Fierce Light, whether it is able to inspire them to discover their own way to engage, spiritually and politically. Because the specific stories are always changing, but the understanding of a paradigm shift can apply to every situation.

I have to say, in twenty five years of filmmaking, I've never released a film that has been as transformative for an audience as Fierce Light. And, at the same time, I've never released a film that triggers people as deeply Fierce Light has, with a small handful of reviewers. It's really interesting.

Stay tuned for part three of the trilogy - it comes out of this kind of a dialogue. It's spirituality meets science in a time of crisis, called EVOLVE LOVE: The Meaning is Life

Part one of the Fierce Light Trilogy, BTW, is called SCARED SACRED. www.scaredsacred.org

All the best!
Velcrow

Matthew Tripp said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
transparentfilm said...

Wow, was it ever heartbreaking for me to see your opinions of Fierce Light on the South Central Farms website. Ouch. Way more than in the Edmonton paper.

BTW I am not, and never have been new age. In fact I have a problem with the narcissism of new age. That's a simplistic label people throw around, usually when they don't understand spirituality.

A strange night - I just came home from a Fierce Light screening where the applause went on for half the credits, with a standing ovation. People flip out about this film. And then I get this google alert. Made me so sad. Maybe it's the contrast.